This entry was posted by on Thursday, 16 July, 2009 at

Some critics of representative culture democracy argue that bush the education existence of political cnn parties means that the representatives were forced to follow ideological lines, as well as the specific interests of their party, rather than to their own will or by the electorate. While the other part is thinking, and often argued that voters have already expressed their will in elections by voting for an election after which the representatives are expected to meet, but this will in turn election may be limited by the scarcity or existence of political parties with limited presence election by an unequal distribution capacity and financing of their election campaign, by the presence of closed lists, or the lack of differences between their respective political agendas (which is particularly prevalent in the case of models essentially bipartisan).
A major problem of representative democracy is corruption, or abuse of power resulting policy from a post of representative to take advantage for personal gain that led to the extreme can lead to kleptocracy. Another vote problem is the increasing cost of election campaigns, which can make the candidates and parties who have established agreements with funded his campaign, to legislate in united states their favor once the candidate has been elected, by promoting a plutocracy.
Another criticism is the bipartisanship that led many in the party systems. This situation often leads two games to grab the almost exclusive attention of the media race and government the public, passing the military remaining more or less unnoticed for the bulk of the population.
Despite all these criticisms, many people argued that representative democracy is the best system of government possible, or George bush at least political the most viable of all known or practiced. For example, Les Marshall, an expert on the spread of democracy to nations that issues traditionally have not been democratic, that “overall, there is an alternative to representative democracy based on parties.” The reality clinton is that representative democracy is the prevailing system of government in countries generally regarded as democratic by themselves, which tend to dominate economic models based on the national economy of the capitalist free market (commonly associated with religion liberalism, particularly political and Economy). Others such as Argentine constitutionalist and German J. congress Bidart Campos, Reinaldo Jorge Vanossi and from other media optical Roberto LoPresti, argue that include forms of direct democracy, such as mandates or revocation of the popular iraq initiative and improve the institutional functioning purged predominantly indirect. Yet economic there are few countries with a tradition of direct democracy so pure as in the case of landgemeinde in Switzerland.

Product Details Product Details

Comments are closed.